Google Meet vs. Microsoft Teams: Pick the right tool for your team
Google Meet and Microsoft Teams both handle video calls. But the right choice depends on your stack, your team, and what happens after the meeting ends.
Most people don't choose between Google Meet and Microsoft Teams from scratch. They're already in one ecosystem and wondering if the other one is worth switching to, or they're setting up a team and want to pick the right stack from the start.
Both tools work. Both are widely used. And both will let you run a video call without much trouble.
But the question is which one fits the way you and your team actually work. Because the meeting tool you choose doesn't exist in isolation. It sits inside a broader suite of apps, connects to your calendar, affects how people collaborate between calls, and shapes what happens after every meeting ends.
Google Meet and MS Teams: Two tools built around two different ecosystems
The most important thing to understand about this comparison is that Google Meet and Microsoft Teams aren't just video call apps. They're each the meetings layer of a much larger productivity stack.
Google Meet is native to Google Workspace. It's tightly connected to Google Calendar, Gmail, and Google Drive. Starting a call from a calendar invite, sharing a Doc mid-meeting, or recording to Drive all happen with almost no friction. If your team lives in Google, Meet slots in naturally.
Microsoft Teams is native to Microsoft 365. It integrates directly with Outlook, SharePoint, OneDrive, and the rest of the Microsoft suite. For organizations already running on Excel, Word, and Outlook, Teams becomes the center of the workflow.
The simplest framing: if you're on Google Workspace, Meet is the obvious choice. If you're on Microsoft 365, Teams makes more sense.
Feature
Google Meet
Microsoft Teams
Free plan
Yes
Yes
Group meeting limit (free)
60 minutes
60 minutes
Max participants (paid)
1,000
1,000
Max meeting length (paid)
24 hours
30 hours
Built-in team chat
Limited
Yes (channels + threads)
Async collaboration
Limited
Strong
AI assistant
Gemini
Copilot
Ease of setup
Very easy
Moderate
External guest access
Very easy (browser link)
Better with the app
Meeting recording
Paid plans
Paid plans
Native ecosystem
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
Ease of use: Simple vs. feature-rich
This is one of the clearest differences between the two tools, and it shows up immediately.
Google Meet is built around simplicity. The interface is clean, there's almost no learning curve, and external guests can join a call from a browser link without downloading anything or creating an account. For client-facing teams, sales calls, or anyone who regularly meets with people outside their organization, that frictionlessness matters.
Microsoft Teams is more capable, but more complex. There's more to learn, more settings to navigate, and for new users, a longer ramp-up time before everything feels intuitive. That complexity exists for a reason: Teams is doing a lot more than running video calls.
For a team that just needs reliable video meetings, Google Meet wins on simplicity. For a team that wants channels, persistent chat threads, tabs, and a central place to manage project work alongside meetings, Teams wins on depth.
Pricing: What you're actually paying for
Both tools have free plans worth knowing about, though neither free tier is suited to teams with serious meeting needs.
On the free plan, both Google Meet and Microsoft Teams cap group meetings at 60 minutes. Both offer 1-on-1 calls with longer limits. The real differences show on their paid plans.
Google Meet is bundled with Google Workspace. Paid plans currently start at around $7 per user per month (Business Starter) and go up from there. Teams is bundled with Microsoft 365, with paid plans starting from around $6 per user per month (Microsoft 365 Business Basic), though the full Teams experience is included across most tiers.
For most teams, this means the decision isn't really "which meeting tool is cheaper?" It's "which productivity suite do we want to pay for?" Both platforms bundle far more than just video calling into their paid plans. You're choosing a complete working environment, and meetings are one part of it.
Google Meet (Google Workspace)
Microsoft Teams (Microsoft 365)
Free: 100 participants, 60-minute group meetings, browser-based
Free: 100 participants, 60-minute group meetings, web and mobile only
Business Starter (starts at $7/user/month): 24-hour meetings, 150 participants, 30 GB Drive storage
Microsoft 365 Business Basic ($7.20/user/month): 30-hour meetings, 300 participants, 1 TB cloud storage, web and mobile Office apps
Business Standard (starts at $14/user/month): Recording, breakout rooms, polls, noise cancellation, Gemini AI tools, 2 TB Drive storage
Microsoft 365 Business Standard ($15.00/user/month): Desktop Office apps, cloud recording, webinars, 1 TB cloud storage
Business Plus (starts at $22/user/month): Attendance tracking, 500-participant capacity, 5 TB Drive storage
Microsoft 365 Business Premium ($26.40/user/month): Advanced security, identity and access management, full Copilot AI, 1 TB cloud storage
Which is better for external meetings, Google Meet or Teams?
For anyone who regularly meets with clients, partners, or candidates outside their organization, ease of guest access is a real consideration.
Google Meet has a meaningful edge here. Guests get a link, click it, open their browser, and they're in. No app download required. No account needed. No friction. For a sales team running demos, a recruiter interviewing candidates, or a consultant meeting a new client, that simplicity reduces the chance that a technical hiccup derails the first impression.
Teams is improving on this front, but the experience for external guests is still better when they have the Teams app installed. Without it, the browser version works but isn't always as smooth. For organizations whose external contacts are also on Microsoft 365 (common in enterprise settings), this is rarely a problem. For teams meeting a wide variety of external contacts, it can be.
If external meetings are a significant part of your week, Google Meet's frictionless guest access is worth factoring in.
Which is better for internal collaboration?
When the meeting ends and the real work continues, Teams has a clear advantage.
Channels let teams organize conversations by project, department, or topic. Threads keep discussions structured. Tabs let you pin Docs, spreadsheets, or third-party tools directly inside a channel. Everything persists, so important context doesn't vanish after a call ends or get buried in someone's inbox.
Google Meet doesn't try to do any of that. It's a video calling tool, and a good one, but it stops there. Teams wanting async collaboration, threaded project conversations, or a central hub for internal communication will need to bring in Google Chat alongside Meet. That works, but it's a less joined-up experience than Teams provides out of the box.
For teams running multiple workstreams in parallel, or anyone who needs to stay aligned between meetings without defaulting to email, Teams is the stronger fit.
Which is better, Google Meet or MS Teams?
The honest truth is that there isn't a universally better option. Both tools are well-built, widely used, and more than capable of handling video meetings reliably. What makes one a better fit than the other comes down to a handful of practical factors: the productivity suite your team already runs on, how often you meet with people outside your organization, and how much collaboration happens between calls rather than during them.
Choose Google Meet if:
You're on Google Workspace
You have frequent external meetings with clients or guests
You want the simplest possible setup with no learning curve
Your team doesn't need persistent channels or async project threads
Choose Microsoft Teams if:
You're on Microsoft 365
Your team relies on channels, async threads, and deep collaboration between meetings
Your external contacts are also on Microsoft 365
You need a single platform that handles both meetings and internal communication
If you're choosing from scratch, start by deciding which productivity suite fits your team, and let the meeting tool follow from that.
Your meeting tool is only half the story
Neither Google Meet nor Microsoft Teams is the wrong choice. They're both solid, widely adopted, and reliable. The decision comes down to your existing stack, how often you meet externally, and how much your team relies on async collaboration between calls.
What both tools leave open is the question of follow-through. Every meeting ends with actions that need tracking, emails that need sending, and threads that need continuing. That's where time gets lost, and where a tool like Fyxer picks up the work. It joins your calls, captures the notes, drafts the follow-ups, and keeps your inbox organized so that what gets decided in meetings actually gets done.
The call is handled. The rest of it can be too.
Google Meet vs Teams FAQs
Which is easier to use, Google Meet or Teams?
Google Meet is generally easier to set up and use, particularly for external guests who can join via a browser link without an account or app. Teams has more features but a steeper learning curve.
Which is better for external meetings with clients?
Google Meet. External guests can join from a browser link with no download and no account required, which means fewer technical barriers before the call starts.
Can you use Google Meet with Microsoft 365, or Teams with Google Workspace?
Technically yes, but you lose the tight integrations that make each tool most useful. Teams works best inside the Microsoft ecosystem. Meet works best inside Google Workspace. Mixing and matching is possible, but the experience is stronger when you're in the native environment.
